Horst D. Deckert

Archbishop Viganò: Rulers want extermination of peoples!

By JÖRG WOLLSCHLÄGER | In an interview with journalistic mastermind Steve Bannon, fearless fighter Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò speaks of an onotological failure of the Great Reset, as it is inspired by inhuman and diabolical principles. We must counter the godless model of a dystopian society with honesty, loyalty, sincerity and fear of God, he calls! He calls the current church leaders heretics and traitors.

Your Excellency, after the psychopandemic, we now have the Russian-Ukrainian crisis. Are we in „phase two“ of a single project, or can we now consider the Covid farce over and deal with the rise in energy prices?

If we had been dealing with a real pandemic in the last two years, caused by a deadly virus for which there was no cure other than a vaccine, we might think that the emergency was not intentional. But this is not the case: the SARS-CoV‑2 virus is nothing more than a seasonal flu that could have been cured with existing treatments and effective prevention based on strengthening the immune system. The banning of treatments, the discrediting of the effectiveness of medicines that have been used for decades, the decision to place elderly people who are ill in nursing homes, and the introduction of experimental gene therapy that has proved not only ineffective but also harmful and often fatal – all this confirms to us that the pandemic was planned and managed with the aim of causing the greatest possible damage. This is a fact that has been established and confirmed by the official data, although this data has been systematically falsified.

Certainly, those who wanted to steer the pandemic in this way are not ready to give in easily now, also because there are interests worth billions behind all this. But what „they“ want does not always have to come to pass.

Same reaction to pandemic worldwide

In your opinion, was the pandemic handled this way out of inexperience, Excellency? Or was it due to the corruption of those in charge, who have a conflict of interest because they are paid by the pharmaceutical industry?

This is the second element to consider: the response to the pandemic was the same all over the world: Health authorities slavishly conformed to health protocols that ran counter to scientific literature and medical evidence, and instead followed the instructions of self-proclaimed „experts“ known for their sensational failures, their apocalyptic predictions that were completely out of touch with reality, and their serious conflicts of interest. We cannot believe that millions of doctors around the world have lost their basic medical knowledge and believe that you should let flu grow into pneumonia and then treat it with tachypirin or put patients on a ventilator. If they have done so, it is because of pressure – to the point of blackmail – from health authorities on medical staff, with the help of a scandalous campaign of media terrorism and with the support of Western leaders. Most of these leaders are members of a lobby – the World Economic Forum – which has trained them and placed them at the highest levels of national and international institutions to ensure that those in power are compliant. Klaus Schwab has publicly boasted on many occasions that he is able to intervene even with religious leaders. These are also documented facts in all the countries that have followed the directives of the WHO and the pharmaceutical companies. There is clearly a single script under a single direction: this proves the existence of a criminal plan and the wickedness of its authors.

Silent coup since the 1990s

In some of your other statements you have spoken of a „golpe bianco“ (a „silent coup“).

A „silent coup“ is a coup d’état that takes place without the use of force and is carried out by a government that exercises its power in an unconstitutional way.

In this case, the coup was carried out almost simultaneously in all Western countries, starting in the early years of the 1990s. In Italy, this coup d’état began with the sale of companies in which investments were made and the privatisation of services that normally burdened the state treasury, such as health and transport, on the instructions of high finance, which Mario Draghi received on the yacht Britannia on 2 June 1992. Yes, Mario Draghi, who was then Director General of the Ministry of Finance and whom the then President of the Italian Republic, Francesco Cossiga, called a „cowardly businessman“. In other countries, this overthrow took place in an analogous way, with a series of gradual transfers of sovereignty to supranational institutions such as the European Commission, the European Central Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. With the introduction of the euro [in 2002], monetary sovereignty was taken away from the states that were party to the Maastricht Treaty and transferred to the European Central Bank, which is a private bank. This bank decides on the interest rate with which it finances national budgets, using the money that these same countries have already given it. In practice, the European Central Bank charges interest on money that it gives back only a penny at a time, and only under certain conditions: Reforms, cuts in public spending, the introduction of laws promoting gender equality, abortion rights, the indoctrination of children, etc. The introduction of a balanced budget into the constitution – as if the state were a company – was also part of the silent coup.

All the members of these bodies, including the same rulers who were appointed on the recommendation of unelected powers or won elections thanks to the manipulation of information, are at the same time servants of high finance corporations or large investment funds – some were their employees, like Draghi of Goldman Sachs – others became employees after their term of office ended. Just as the drug authorities and health organisations are made up of former BigPharma employees, who are often given consultancy contracts and paid by the very pharmaceutical companies they are supposed to keep an eye on.

In practice, until the pandemic, power was still administered by the individual states, at least formally, and laws were passed by parliaments. But for the last two years, parliaments have been stripped of power, and all those who have succeeded in bringing the World Economic Forum and other lobbies to the top of governments and international institutions have begun to legislate against the constitution and the interests of the nation, They obey orders given to them from above – „by the markets“, as they tell us – which in reality are made up of a very small number of multinationals which gobble up competing companies, destroy professional skills by damaging the quality of the product and reduce workers‘ protection and wages thanks to the complicity of the unions and the left.

In short, we are governed by a high command of profiteers and speculators, from Bill Gates investing in large farms on the eve of the food crisis or in vaccines just before the outbreak of the pandemic, to George Soros speculating on the fluctuations of currencies and government bonds and financing a bio-lab in Ukraine with Hunter Biden.

To believe that there is no connection between the instigators of these crimes and those who carry them out at the highest levels of national governments, the EU and the UN is a sign of mistrust, because even a child could understand that we are being held hostage by a group of ideologically deviant and morally corrupt technocrats. The peoples of the world must reclaim their sovereignty, which has been usurped by the globalist elite.

Rulers want extermination of peoples

The instigators of this crime proudly show themselves at the Davos Forum, at the meetings of the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Group together with the rulers, the prime ministers, the directors of newspapers and TV channels, the CEOs of social bankers and the directors of social platforms and multinationals, the bankers and the directors of rating agencies, the presidents of foundations and self-proclaimed philanthropists. They all pursue the same agenda – which they publish on their websites – and are so convinced of their own power that they affirm with impunity – as Soros and Schwab have recently done – that it is necessary to create a narrative that is disseminated through the mainstream media in order to make their decisions acceptable to the people. Censorship and mass manipulation are used by them as instrumentum regni, and we have seen this in both the pandemic farce and the pro-Zelensky propaganda in Ukraine.

We must understand that our rulers are traitors to our nation, dedicated to the extermination of the population, and that all their actions are aimed at inflicting the greatest possible harm on the citizens. This is not a problem of inexperience or incompetence, but of intentio nocendi – deliberate intent to harm. Honest citizens find it inconceivable that those who govern them do so with the perverse intention of undermining and destroying them, so much so that they find it hard to believe it. The main cause of this serious problem lies in the corruption of authority and the resigned obedience of the governed.

Church leaders heretics and traitors

Beginning with the revolution of the Second Vatican Council and especially during the last nine years of the Bergoglian „pontificate“, the Catholic Church has also experienced the same cognitive dissonance: The faithful and the clergy have resigned themselves to obeying mere cynical officials – who are no less corrupt and perverse than their counterparts in the deep state – even though it was obvious that the aim of the alleged „reforms“ was always the systematic destruction of the Church by its supreme leaders, who are heretics and traitors. And I note that the deep church has resorted to the same false arguments to disguise doctrinal, moral and liturgical dissolution: first and foremost, the false claim that these reforms were demanded „from the bottom up“ and not imposed by force from above. Just as the reforms planned by the World Economic Forum, the Bilderberg Group and the Trilaterals are embraced by their infiltrators at the highest levels of nations and international organisations, giving the appearance that their plans are ratified by popular consent.

Distinguish between obedience and submissiveness

And what is your advice, Your Excellency, to get out of this impasse?

Respect for authority is innate in civilised man, but it is necessary to distinguish between obedience and servility. You see, every virtue consists of the just mean between two opposite vices, without being a compromise, but also as a summit, so to speak, between two valleys. Disobedience sins by falling short, by refusing to submit to a good command from a legitimate authority; submissiveness, on the other hand, sins by going overboard, by submitting to unjust commands or commands given by an illegitimate authority. The good citizen should know how to disobey civil authority, and the good Catholic should do the same with ecclesiastical authority, disobeying when authority demands obedience to an unjust order.

Earthly authority always subordinate to the Lord’s royal authority

Doesn’t this talk seem a little revolutionary to you, Excellency?

Far from it. The anarchists and the courtiers both have a distorted idea of authority: the one denies it, the other idolises it. The just remedy is the only morally viable way, because it corresponds to the order which the Lord has impressed on the world and which the heavenly hierarchy respects. We owe obedience to legitimate authority to the extent that it exercises its power for the purposes for which it was instituted by God: the temporal good of the citizens in the case of the state, and the spiritual good of the faithful in the case of the Church. An authority that imposes evil on its subjects is for this reason illegitimate and its orders are void. Let us not forget that the true Lord, from whom all authority emanates, is God, and that earthly authority – both civil and spiritual – is always vicarious, that is, subordinate to the authority of Jesus Christ, King and High Priest. To substitute the vicarious authority of rulers for the royal authority of the Lord is a crazy gesture and – yes – revolutionary and rebellious.

Elite wants to establish totalitarian regime through treason and subversion

What does the elite want to achieve? It promises us peace, security, prosperity and jobs, but at present there are more than fifty armed conflicts in the world; our cities are uninhabitable, full of criminals, dilapidated and ruled by minorities of deviant people.

This is the third undeniable element that cannot be overlooked: the pandemic was planned as an instrument to establish a totalitarian regime designed by unelected technocrats without any sense of democratic representation.

The same is happening with the Ukraine crisis: the majority of citizens are absolutely not in favour of sending weapons to Ukraine and imposing sanctions on the Russian Federation, and yet government leaders act as if they have the full support of their own nations, supported by embarrassing distortions of reality by the mainstream media. And in some countries, like Italy, this is happening in a situation of disturbing complicity of all state powers, both in legitimising the violation of fundamental rights under the anti-Kovid decrees and in ratifying the participation in a conflict, although the Italian Parliament has never deliberated on the entry into this conflict and which even the President of the Republic, the guarantor of the Constitution, approves and promotes to the applause of the European technocrats. In this case too, those in power do not obey the will of the people and do not pursue the common good, but follow orders given to them by supranational entities with their own, notoriously subversive, interests.

When they talk about the „transformation of goods into services“ and the „sharing economy“ through the digital sector, they want to dispossess citizens of their private property: „You will own nothing and you will be happy.“ And when they push through the privatisation of state goods or services, they want to appropriate the profits while leaving the costs on the shoulders of the community. But since not all countries are willing to go along with this „reset“, they force them to do so by provoking economic crises, pandemics and wars. This is treason and subversion.

The premeditated nature of this subversion is evident, as is the awareness of the disastrous consequences of the social, economic and health decisions made in relation to both the pandemic and the Ukraine crisis. Bergoglio has also admitted it: A head of state revealed to him months before Putin’s military operation in Ukraine that NATO and the European Union were deliberately provoking the Russian Federation after years of ignoring the ethnic cleansing carried out by Kiev against the Russian-speaking minority in the Donbass and Crimea. The aim of this provocation was to spark a conflict that would serve as a pretext to legitimise the imposition of sanctions against the Russian Federation and force Western states to initiate the „green transition“. At the same time, the nations‘ economies were to be dragged down for the benefit of a few international investment funds and market speculation. Essentially, the same premises are invoked to justify the Enclosure Acts in England and later the Holodomor in Ukraine, in order to turn the peasant masses into cheap labour for the industrialisation of the big cities. To avoid war, NATO should not have been expanded in violation of the treaty, and protection of the Russian-speaking minority in Ukraine should have been guaranteed, as called for in the 2014 Minsk Protocol.

If this has not happened, it is because the real purpose they wanted to achieve has nothing to do with the apparent purpose they publicly proclaimed. And I note that these are not abstract speculations, but concrete facts that were foreseen and planned decades ago by the theorists of the Great Reset to force a social change that nobody wants and to reboot the economy and finance of the Western world from scratch – just like you reboot a computer.

The fact that this leads to misery, bankruptcy, the failure of businesses, unemployment, social instability and the widening of the gap between rich and poor, the decline of the birth rate and the dismantling of essential services is seen as a negligible detail, with the sole aim of indoctrinating the masses with false arguments advocating war or control over every detail of people’s lives, criminalising anyone who disagrees and making them out to be the enemy of the people. It seems to me that this narrative is sinking under the weight of the lies of the elite and their accomplices.

If this has not happened, it is because the real purpose they wanted to achieve has nothing to do with the apparent purpose they publicly proclaimed. And I note that these are not abstract speculations, but concrete facts that were foreseen and planned decades ago by the theorists of the Great Reset to force a social change that nobody wants and to reboot the economy and finance of the Western world from scratch – just like you reboot a computer.

The fact that this leads to misery, bankruptcy, the failure of businesses, unemployment, social instability and the widening of the gap between rich and poor, the decline of the birth rate and the dismantling of essential services is seen as a negligible detail, with the sole aim of indoctrinating the masses with false arguments advocating war or control over every detail of people’s lives, criminalising anyone who disagrees and making them out to be the enemy of the people. It seems to me that this narrative is sinking under the weight of the lies of the elite and their accomplices.

Social engineering through immigration and interbreeding

Could you give us an example, Your Excellency?

The most obvious example is the discovery that Richard Kalergi, one of the founding fathers of the European Union, wanted to pursue a policy of social engineering aimed at transforming European national societies through immigration and interbreeding, by driving waves of migration with the attraction of cheaper labour. The vicious tenacity with which waves of illegal immigrants continue to be welcomed, even when the effects of this phenomenon on urban security, general crime rates and the identity of national populations are obvious, shows that the original plan has largely come to fruition and that measures must be taken to prevent it from being completed.

But these are not random events: They told us so.

You are absolutely right: what amazes me is the brazenness with which the proponents of Agenda 2030 have told us long in advance what criminal projects they want to impose on us against our will; despite this evidence, there are those who are amazed that, after years of unstoppable infiltration, they are actually carrying out their plans before our eyes, while accusing us of being „conspiracy theorists“. There is definitely a conspiracy, but those who need to be brought to justice are those who carried it out, not those who denounce it.

Joe Biden blames the crisis on Vladimir Putin. Do you agree with this assessment?

Americans know very well that the price of petrol was rising long before the Russian-Ukrainian crisis and has continued to rise because of the sanctions – real or alleged – imposed by the international community on the Russian Federation. Today we know that the sanctions – predictably – have not affected Putin in the slightest, but the motive behind them is that they were intended to hit Western nations, and especially European nations, in order to provoke an economic and energy crisis to legitimise ecological conversion, rationing, population control and censorship of information.

Putin did not fall for the provocations of the deep state and limited himself to intervening only as much as was necessary to provide security and protection to the Russian-speaking Donbass. And he stormed the Azovstal steelworks, which housed one of the secret American bio-labs where bacteriological weapons were produced and experiments with SARS-CoV‑2 were carried out. On the other hand, the Biden family had a vested interest in waging a war in Ukraine to cover up the corruption cases Hunter Biden was involved in and to distract from the looming scandals looming against Obama and Hillary Clinton for Russiagate and against the deep state for election fraud against Trump.

The US proxy war against the Russian invasion is really a war of the deep state against a nation that has refused to be taken in by the delusions of globalist technocrats and now has evidence of the crimes of the deep state. But while the EU can blackmail European nations by conditioning the disbursement of funds and interest on loans on the implementation of „reforms“ – since these nations have limited monetary and fiscal sovereignty – the same is not true of Russia, which is a sovereign and independent nation, self-sufficient in raw materials, energy and agricultural food.

The hegemonic left

Is this bipolar vision, which revisits the Cold War confrontation between the USA and the USSR, no longer valid?

The hegemonic left has introduced a Manichean division between good and evil: left versus right, liberalism versus fascism, globalism versus sovereignism, vaccination versus no-vax. The „good guys“ are obviously the left: liberal but solidarity, globalist, inclusive, ecumenical, resilient and sustainable. The „bad guys“ are just as obviously patriots, Christians, right-wingers, sovereigntists and heterosexuals.

Fusion of Liberalism and Collective Socialism

What distinguishes the present structure of Western countries from the past?

The fusion of the worst of liberalism with the worst of collective socialism. Today, after two years of the pandemic farce, we see globalist liberalism using communist and dictatorial methods to impose itself with its Great Reset, and communist regimes using liberal methods to enrich the upper echelons of the party without losing total control over the population. This shows that the geopolitical balance is shifting towards a multipolar vision and that bipolarism fuelled by the deep state is in decline.

Is there a parallel with what is happening in the Catholic Church under the pontificate of Jorge Mario Bergoglio?

The deep church is in a sense an offshoot of the deep state. For this reason, we should not be surprised to witness the destruction of faith and morals in the name of ecumenism and synodality, applying liberal errors in the theological field; and, on the other hand, the transformation of the papacy and the Roman Curia into a politburo in which ecclesiastical authority is both absolute and divested of its fidelity to the Magisterium, according to the modalities of the exercise of power in a communist-style dictatorship. Law is no longer based on justice, but on the convenience and benefit of those who apply it: Suffice it to see how harshly the Vatican treats clergy and the faithful who are traditional, and on the other hand, with what leniency the Vatican praises notorious abortion advocates (I think of Biden and Pelosi as the most conspicuous cases) as well as the propagandists of LGBTQ ideology and gender theory. Again, liberalism and communism have allied to destroy the institution from within, as has happened in the civil sphere. But we know that contra legem fit, quod in fraudem legis fit – what circumvents the law is done against the law.

Your Excellency, how do you think things may change in the United States in the near future?

The eventual return of Donald Trump to the White House would allow for real peace negotiations once the deep state has been eradicated from the administration and government agencies. But reconstruction will certainly require the cooperation and sacrifice of all, as well as a solid spiritual vision to inspire the rebuilding of the social fabric. If all this has been done through proven electoral fraud in the last presidential election, Trump’s victory would be even more conspicuous and would have strong implications for the ramifications of the deep state in Europe and especially in Italy.

In any case, the mid-term elections could give the Republicans a majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate, once the servants of the deep state – including above all the „neoconservatives“ – have been forced out of office.

Great Reset doomed to failure

So has the Great Reset failed? Can we sing a victory song?

A victory song can only be sung when the war has been won. The Great Reset is ontologically doomed to fail because it is inspired by inhuman and diabolical principles. But its end, inevitable as it may be, may still take some time, depending on what we are able to oppose it with and what is in the plans of divine providence.

If the Lord wants to grant us a truce, a time of peace, after we have understood how terrible is the hell on earth that the enemies of God and of man are aiming at, then we must commit ourselves to rebuild – not „better rebuild“, but just the opposite – yes, to rebuild what has been destroyed: the family, the bond of marriage, the moral education of children, love for our country, devotion to hard work and brotherly charity, especially towards the most defenceless and needy. We must affirm the sanctity and inviolability of life from conception to natural death, defend the complementarity of the two sexes against the madness of gender ideology, protect children from depravity and guarantee the innocence to which they are entitled. We must finally leave behind the logic of profit – typical of the liberal mentality – to recover the pride of doing our duty, even if no one is watching us, to professionally produce what we produce and sell it at an honest price. And we need to stop thinking of ourselves as inferior just because someone has decided that being honest, loyal, sincere and God-fearing is something to be ashamed of in their godless model of a dystopian society. Rather, those who call for the killing of children and the elderly, the planned extermination of the population through vicious vaccination campaigns, mass sterilisation, sodomy, paedophilia and the most deviant aberrations should be ashamed.

Only where Christ reigns can there be true justice and true peace

Your Excellency, do you believe that the world can return to God?

The world can and must return to God: This is a necessity that arises from the divine order that the Creator has impressed upon creation. It must return to God, for only where Christ reigns can there be true justice and true peace. And the world can do this, but not in a collectivist or communitarian vision in which the individual disappears into the masses, but in a personal and individual vision in which each of us freely recognises that nothing can be better than what our heavenly Father has prepared for us, because he loves us and wants us to share in his glory.

When we all return to God, our nations will also recognise His rule and conform their laws to His law. So let us pray that what the psalmist sings may become a reality: Laudate Dominum omnes gentes; laudate eum omnes populi (Ps 116:1)- Praise the Lord, you nations, praise him, you peoples. Quoniam confirmata est super nos misericordia ejus; et veritas Domini manet in æternum (Ps 116:2)- For his mercy is confirmed upon us, and the truth of the Lord abideth forever.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

21 June 2022, Saint Aloysius Gonzaga

Source: Link

Ähnliche Nachrichten